Seneca Distributing Co. v. Fulton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Seneca Distributing Co. v. Fulton

175 A.D. 902

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 175 A.D. 902 (Seneca Distributing Co. v. Fulton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seneca Distributing Co. v. Fulton, 175 A.D. 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the finding that Fulton, in procuring his wife to execute the instrument in suit, acted as the agent of the plaintiff, is against the evidence; and that the finding that the wife did not understand the essential nature and effect of the instrument when she executed it is against the greater weight of the evidence. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the finding that Fulton, in procuring his wife to execute the instrument in suit, acted as the agent of the plaintiff, is against the evidence; and that the finding that the wife did not understand the essential nature and effect of the instrument when she executed it is against the greater weight of the evidence. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 A.D. 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seneca-distributing-co-v-fulton-nyappdiv-1916.