Sendzikowski v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.

58 Ill. App. 418, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 62
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedApril 22, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 58 Ill. App. 418 (Sendzikowski v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sendzikowski v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co., 58 Ill. App. 418, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 62 (Ill. Ct. App. 1895).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

We think that the evidence in this case raised a question for the jury, under the principles constantly recognized, that a servant obeying improper orders of a superior or using for a brief time defective appliances under a promise of immediate repair, and injured in consequence, is not without remedy; and that therefore the court erred in instructing the jury to find for the appellee.

As the case is to go back we refrain from commenting upon the evidence.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Sendzikowski
72 Ill. App. 402 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1897)
Tesmer v. Boehm
58 Ill. App. 609 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Ill. App. 418, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sendzikowski-v-mccormick-harvesting-machine-co-illappct-1895.