Sendzikowski v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.

58 Ill. App. 418, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 62
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 22, 1895·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

We think that the evidence in this case raised a question for the jury, under the principles constantly recognized, that a servant obeying improper orders of a superior or using for a brief time defective appliances under a promise of immediate repair, and injured in consequence, is not without remedy; and that therefore the court erred in instructing the jury to find for the appellee.

As the case is to go back we refrain from commenting upon the evidence.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sendzikowski v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co., 58 Ill. App. 418, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 62 (Ill. Ct. App. 1895).

58 Ill. App. 418 (Sendzikowski v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Sendzikowski
72 Ill. App. 402 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1897)
Tesmer v. Boehm
58 Ill. App. 609 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1895)