Sence v. Atoynatan

142 A.D.3d 599, 36 N.Y.S.3d 603
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 17, 2016·No. 2014-10396·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated September 24, 2014, which granted the motion of the defendant New York Methodist Hospital pursuant to CPLR 2601, inter alia, for leave to pay the limits of its insurance policy into court.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

CPLR 2601 (a) provides that “[a] party paying money into court pursuant to the direction of the court is discharged thereby from all further liability to the extent of the money so paid in.'” Here, following a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs and against, among others, the defendant New York Methodist Hospital (hereinafter NYMH), after adjustments pursuant to Public Health Law § 2999-j (6) (b) and (14), in the total present value sum of $13,815,290, the Supreme Court granted NYMH’s motion pursuant to CPLR 2601, inter alia, for leave to pay the full amount of its insurance policy, $7,500,000, into court, in order to stop the accrual of interest on that amount. Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the court properly permitted *600 NYMH to pay the limits of its insurance policy into court (see Schmitt v Werner Enters., 277 AD2d 1003 [2000]; Hiraldo v Khan, 262 AD2d 607 [1999]).

Rivera, J.P., Miller, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sence v. Atoynatan, 142 A.D.3d 599, 36 N.Y.S.3d 603 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

142 A.D.3d 599 (Sence v. Atoynatan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sence v. Atoynatan
142 A.D.3d 603 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)