Sena v. White

77 So. 2d 786
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 25, 1955
StatusPublished

This text of 77 So. 2d 786 (Sena v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sena v. White, 77 So. 2d 786 (Fla. 1955).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record and the briefs in this cause have been examined. The facts distinguish the case from Muller v. Maxcy, Fla., 74 So.2d 879. Appellant not having made error clearly appear, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

MATHEWS, C. J., and TERRELL, SEBRING and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Muller v. Maxcy
74 So. 2d 879 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 So. 2d 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sena-v-white-fla-1955.