Sena v. White
77 So. 2d 786
Opinion
The record and the briefs in this cause have been examined. The facts distinguish the case from Muller v. Maxcy, Fla., 74 So.2d 879. Appellant not having made error clearly appear, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sena v. White, 77 So. 2d 786 (Fla. 1955).
77 So. 2d 786 (Sena v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Muller v. Maxcy
74 So. 2d 879 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)