Sena v. Lane

871 So. 2d 923, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3304, 2004 WL 576100
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 17, 2004·No. No. 3D03-3043·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Lallouz v. Lallouz, 695 So.2d 466, 467-68 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Cheesbro Roofing, Inc., 502 So.2d 484, 486 n. 4 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)(superceded by statute on other grounds); Royal v. Parado, 462 So.2d 849, 853 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sena v. Lane, 871 So. 2d 923, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3304, 2004 WL 576100 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

871 So. 2d 923 (Sena v. Lane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Royal v. Parado
462 So. 2d 849 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Lallouz v. Lallouz
695 So. 2d 466 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Publix Super Markets v. Cheesbro Roofing
502 So. 2d 484 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)