Semple v. Burkey

2 Cal. 321
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1852
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Cal. 321 (Semple v. Burkey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Semple v. Burkey, 2 Cal. 321 (Cal. 1852).

Opinion

Heydenfeldt, Justice.

This record discloses the trial by the Court of a motion involving an issue of fact.

The judgment recites, by consent of parties the motion is overruled without prejudice to either party on appeal.”

This judgment is pro forma, but it is unaccompanied by any agreed statement of facts, and there is no finding by the Court.

In Russel v. Almador, we decided that without such finding the judgment cannot stand. The agreed statement of facts can be the only substitute for it.

The judgment is reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waller v. Weston
57 P. 892 (California Supreme Court, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Cal. 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/semple-v-burkey-cal-1852.