Sempey v. Lenz

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Sempey v. Lenz

355 A.2d 124, 170 Conn. 725

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sempey v. Lenz. Read the opinion of the Court — 172 Conn. 207 →

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 24, 1976·Published

Opinion

The plaintiff’s “Motion for Permission to File Typewritten Briefs and Appendices and for Order that Plaintiff Shall Not Have to Bear the Expense of Subsequent Printing” in the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County at Stamford is granted to the extent that permission is given her to file typed copies of her brief and appendix so long as they are clearly legible and she complies with the other requirements of §§ 723 and 724 of the Practice Book, as amended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff’s “Motion for Permission to File Typewritten Briefs and Appendices and for Order that Plaintiff Shall Not Have to Bear the Expense of Subsequent Printing” in the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County at Stamford is granted to the extent that permission is given her to file typed copies of her brief and appendix so long as they are clearly legible and she complies with the other requirements of §§ 723 and 724 of the Practice Book, as amended.

Sempey v. Lenz, 355 A.2d 124, 170 Conn. 725 (Colo. 1976).

Pincite

355 A.2d 124 (Sempey v. Lenz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.