Sempey v. Lenz

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Sempey v. Lenz

355 A.2d 124, 170 Conn. 725

DecidedMarch 24, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 355 A.2d 124 (Sempey v. Lenz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sempey v. Lenz, 355 A.2d 124, 170 Conn. 725 (Colo. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiff’s “Motion for Permission to File Typewritten Briefs and Appendices and for Order that Plaintiff Shall Not Have to Bear the Expense of Subsequent Printing” in the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County at Stamford is granted to the extent that permission is given her to file typed copies of her brief and appendix so long as they are clearly legible and she complies with the other requirements of §§ 723 and 724 of the Practice Book, as amended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff’s “Motion for Permission to File Typewritten Briefs and Appendices and for Order that Plaintiff Shall Not Have to Bear the Expense of Subsequent Printing” in the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County at Stamford is granted to the extent that permission is given her to file typed copies of her brief and appendix so long as they are clearly legible and she complies with the other requirements of §§ 723 and 724 of the Practice Book, as amended.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

355 A.2d 124, 170 Conn. 725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sempey-v-lenz-conn-1976.