Semon v. Saridis

125 A.D.2d 882, 510 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 63071
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 31, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 125 A.D.2d 882 (Semon v. Saridis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Semon v. Saridis, 125 A.D.2d 882, 510 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 63071 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

— Main, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Bradley, J.), entered December 16, 1985 in Albany County, which granted plaintiffs motion for a protective order.

In this matrimonial action, plaintiff initially commenced an action for annulment of the marriage, alleging fraud, and subsequently commenced a divorce proceeding on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. The parties have no children, plaintiff does not seek maintenance and there is no property subject to equitable distribution. The sole issue on this appeal is whether defendant is entitled to conduct an examination before trial of plaintiff with regard to plaintiffs grounds for annulment or divorce. Special Term found that he is not so entitled.

This court has recently determined that there is no general prohibition against disclosure concerning the merits of matrimonial actions and that restrictions on such disclosure are better left to individual determination (Nigro v Nigro, 121 AD2d 833, 834). Accordingly, Special Term was not constrained to deny disclosure. Thus, we reverse and remit the matter to Supreme Court to exercise its discretion and decide the motion for a protective order based on the circumstances presented on such motion.

Order reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter [883]*883remitted to Supreme Court for proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schaefer v. Connors
159 A.D.2d 780 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 A.D.2d 882, 510 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 63071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/semon-v-saridis-nyappdiv-1986.