Semler v. Molinelli
This text of 245 A.D.2d 363 (Semler v. Molinelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Berke, J.), dated April 14, 1997, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the affirmation of the plaintiffs treating chiropractor was sufficient to demonstrate the existence of factual issues as to whether the plaintiff suffered a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (see, Stark v Amadio, 239 AD2d 569; Rut v Grigonis, 214 AD2d 721; Bates v Peeples, 171 AD2d 635). Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 A.D.2d 363, 666 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/semler-v-molinelli-nyappdiv-1997.