Seminole County v. Osborne
876 So. 2d 737, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10466, 2004 WL 1562200
Opinion
In this workers’ compensation case, we reverse the award of an EEG, biofeedback, a repeat EMG/nerve conduction study and a bone scan because the managed care grievance procedure had not been exhausted and, therefore, the judge of compensation claims lacked jurisdiction to consider the claim for those treatment modalities. See Castro v. AT & T Wireless Servs., Inc., 780 So.2d 917 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). In all other respects, the order is affirmed.
AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Seminole County v. Osborne, 876 So. 2d 737, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10466, 2004 WL 1562200 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
876 So. 2d 737 (Seminole County v. Osborne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Castro v. AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.
780 So. 2d 917 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)