Seminole County v. Grace Properties No. 7, Ltd.

825 So. 2d 996, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10904, 2002 WL 1768983
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 2, 2002
DocketNo. 5D01-3001
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 825 So. 2d 996 (Seminole County v. Grace Properties No. 7, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seminole County v. Grace Properties No. 7, Ltd., 825 So. 2d 996, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10904, 2002 WL 1768983 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Seminole County appeals the award of fees to two landowner’s appraisers in an eminent domain action and the admission of testimony by those appraisers. The County alleges that the appraisers were hired under a contingent fee contract in violation of section 475.628, Florida Statutes (2001).

This court has previously determined that a similar type of contractual arrangement between a landowner and an appraiser in a like situation did not constitute a prohibited contingent fee arrangement. See Seminole County v. Chandrinos, 816 So.2d 1241 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

We find no error in the remaining issues raised by the County.

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Easton v. Aramark Uniform and Career
825 So. 2d 996 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
825 So. 2d 996, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10904, 2002 WL 1768983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seminole-county-v-grace-properties-no-7-ltd-fladistctapp-2002.