Seminole County v. Grace Properties No. 7, Ltd.

825 So. 2d 996, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10904, 2002 WL 1768983
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 2, 2002·No. No. 5D01-3001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Seminole County appeals the award of fees to two landowner’s appraisers in an eminent domain action and the admission of testimony by those appraisers. The County alleges that the appraisers were hired under a contingent fee contract in violation of section 475.628, Florida Statutes (2001).

This court has previously determined that a similar type of contractual arrangement between a landowner and an appraiser in a like situation did not constitute a prohibited contingent fee arrangement. See Seminole County v. Chandrinos, 816 So.2d 1241 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

We find no error in the remaining issues raised by the County.

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seminole County v. Grace Properties No. 7, Ltd., 825 So. 2d 996, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10904, 2002 WL 1768983 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

825 So. 2d 996 (Seminole County v. Grace Properties No. 7, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Easton v. Aramark Uniform and Career
825 So. 2d 996 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)