Seminole County Government v. Kimmel

36 So. 3d 930, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8168, 2010 WL 2293258
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 9, 2010·No. No. 1D10-1749·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellants’ response to this Court’s show cause order of April 14, 2010, we dismiss this appeal because the order on appeal is neither a final order nor a non-final order appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.180. Here, the Judge of Compensation Claims’ (JCC’s) order generally awards indemnity benefits but does not clarify whether they are temporary total disability benefits or temporary partial disability benefits, as illustrated by the sentence, “Jurisdiction is reserved if the parties are not able to administrative calculate the type and amount of indemnity awarded.” See Life Care Ctr. of Winter Haven v. Benjamin, 22 So.3d 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (dismissing appeal where JCC reserved jurisdiction on litigated issue and directed parties [931]*931to administratively determine additional facts and calculate the benefits thereon).

DISMISSED.

WOLF, BENTON, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seminole County Government v. Kimmel, 36 So. 3d 930, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8168, 2010 WL 2293258 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

36 So. 3d 930 (Seminole County Government v. Kimmel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LIFE CARE CENTER OF WINTER HAVEN v. Benjamin
22 So. 3d 152 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)