Seminole County Government v. Kimmel

36 So. 3d 930, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8168, 2010 WL 2293258
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 9, 2010
DocketNo. 1D10-1749
StatusPublished

This text of 36 So. 3d 930 (Seminole County Government v. Kimmel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seminole County Government v. Kimmel, 36 So. 3d 930, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8168, 2010 WL 2293258 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellants’ response to this Court’s show cause order of April 14, 2010, we dismiss this appeal because the order on appeal is neither a final order nor a non-final order appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.180. Here, the Judge of Compensation Claims’ (JCC’s) order generally awards indemnity benefits but does not clarify whether they are temporary total disability benefits or temporary partial disability benefits, as illustrated by the sentence, “Jurisdiction is reserved if the parties are not able to administrative calculate the type and amount of indemnity awarded.” See Life Care Ctr. of Winter Haven v. Benjamin, 22 So.3d 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (dismissing appeal where JCC reserved jurisdiction on litigated issue and directed parties [931]*931to administratively determine additional facts and calculate the benefits thereon).

DISMISSED.

WOLF, BENTON, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

LIFE CARE CENTER OF WINTER HAVEN v. Benjamin
22 So. 3d 152 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 So. 3d 930, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8168, 2010 WL 2293258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seminole-county-government-v-kimmel-fladistctapp-2010.