Semien, William Paul
This text of Semien, William Paul (Semien, William Paul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
yio.'oq-13-OOSWl-Cft
Jn The
Court of Appeals OP The Tl/nth Supreme Ji/efi'cinl District Beaumont, Tews
(JlJ4JPP)Pflui-S£fflIfy) flppellnnt vs.
Appellee
On Bppeftl in £«u^ Wo. J3-HW CrimiTift\ District Court, JePftcson County, 7ej#tf ' JqhnS-tei/enSjJurfje PreSidinj
fippellnnts nation For ^tension of Ti/ne To File Appellants Pfo~5e Petition For Discretionflru $e(//eiu
Uillinm Pnulieynien Bill P. Clements Unit RECEIVED IN *Aiqo434(fi COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS u' ^ ° ' ^UOi 5pur5£l! jan 12 2015 MriHo,T^sw.w Abel Acosti Clerk %. b<)-l3-QQ5$X-Cft
LdJU-IfW PMLSZWZW J If) 7HB Court7 OF ftPPEflLS VS. I SW£ OF 7JEXAS 7H£Sm?bfT£XM> I VJVti 0X37MICT ywioy? Tft &n£y?/) rzwf to mjg flppaiflvrcs PPfl-.K. PETL71QYI MJ)T.«Qf TTAMfljfi£lfTEfJ TO 7tf£ VOWOfWBtS fUSTXt£S OFSftlD HOOPil < WOb)COWS UlU-IftW Pfluj- S£Ptt£fl, Vppellwi in ihe nbcfe Styled And numbered dftuse,nnd owes this Court #> grant nn extension op time to Pile ftppellnnts Pro-se petition For Discretion nru Re\zieu3, pursvmt to Rule set forth in theTexns fiules of fippel|nteProeedure;nnc! for qooddnu^e ShouJslWPollouJinQ'
I. Thii cme is on nppenl Prom the Criminal District Court op Jefferson Cfluntij, Terns;
TheCflSe belotu uins staled THESTflT£6F T£fflS 1/5. U)lU-ZflP) ?R0J-SEWl£'fl,Pii)6 numbered I3-TO9; HP. Appellant (Jns toni/rctecl e>f Jejuni ftesnult;
fippellnnt mas assessed ft sentence oP fiPtM Pii/e (55) uenrs confinement in the institutionnl Dit/ision on floi/ember^aors;
flotice of flppenl uws gii/en on TWernber A(*,M3; izr. Tiuo U)e&emior) nPik the Pro-St Pppellnnt Brief hns bee/) filed in -this tflose, /his Honornble £ourt§rMie6 those extension;. HP, r Rppellnnti F/rst motion to feend the time for Pi inq the Pro-Se Bppellnnt!s |3rtefu)A$ Piled by TerrenceLeon HoIwes,on June/o^o/y; Appellant Momen At thnt time for sfiid flppenl. Seeond motion cons filed bu Ui/liflm Pp>u\$erniert, Pro-$e Appellnnt, onorrtbout August^ W1/; mr. T/)e Appellate br
The Court of Appeals' rendered its judgment on flot/ember/^o/y
ftppellnnt requests w extension of time of thirty (30) dmjs Prom the present dftfe,le. Jflnunry \%WS',
flppellnnt relies on tVie follow/no Pncts flsgood (muse wd beliei/es ttwt he hns e^tenuntina Circumstances fnnt require this ftootM for extension of time be grwrted; M- 0f\ WovernherxS^ow, Appellant received ntruenndCorrect Copu oP the Court's opinion jqmd JueJnwent.; fthm with notip/cnt/onop the DePencJnnti nqht to Pile a pro-se petition For c/fscretionnfy rei/ieu underfilled.
Pppellnnt \s nInumnn oP the jruj nndrenllu/tr^ Iw/Tiq A difficult time trumj to nccurntely present this pejiflon for dtfcrefion/?r Appellant ium plnc^d in trnnsit 5tntu3 by thejrH P. Clements unit nc/ministrntion/stflff lAJithout nny of HiS property ndWithout htfte^ mnterinl/uorK including noy transcripts nnd appellate papers fl$ itms plneed in Bill P. t\etY)zr)ts Unit property room, ns ofthis \S^ dny of Decern ber? ioi4; I hnt/e yet to (we nil my property returned tome', Appellant cnnnot eppedii/elu present ibis Pro-3e petition For Discretionary Piei/ieu) under flute (*? oJithoot nil hvs UqrI m^emlJ uorK including Appellee pnpers rmd frffflStripts; The fiddtfionfll time requested is not sought solely Per delna, nor 30ught frivolously, bu1u)\i\ be oPgenuine nssistflnceto pppelmi in prepnrinfl Appellants brief as fellas researching file Jmu< UH£R£F0fl£? ftppellnnt prnus ft at thisCourtgrnnt this motionnnd modlpy nnde^tenc/ the deadline for Piiinq Appellant's Pro-Se Petition For Discretion nru flei/ieu to Jhnunry ;y,£o)5; ortW ^ tor/ grnntsuch ndditionnl time ns isjust And proper. ^ertiPicfite&PSeMCt Xhereby Certify fhnton December n, xoiy;nCorrectmStfOe Copij of Appellant's Wotiorji Foft. ^tension 10 Pile his Pro-5e Petition For Discretionary ftet//eu) tuns mailed to the tour+of Criminal Appeals bu OS. First Clftss m\ Addressed to the Court oPCrimmnl Append at P.O. &0P m®%} Austin, Te^ns qnn, ftppellMt7 prose L)illinmPnol5em\en Bi\\ P. Clements Unit *oI90H3^(p ^Ol3pur5cH Amnrillo;Texri5 19107-9 (oOlff December fl,3io/4 Clerk oP the Co^rt oPCnminnl Pippenls of lexm Po. %ox mo% ftosftn.Tejrm '. 12711 faittet Dumber'* oq'\3-OQ5VL~t9\ 7r\pi\ Court Q3\se nmbzc' I3-J19/9 DenrtlerKoP the Court ^ncloseo1 plemePihimy pro-St DePemSfints Wet/on For Time to /vie PetifiofT For Pi'scfetiWru (Wfeu), f/ense #/e f/irs Wotion and bring it to the attention oPtheCourt ©PCriminnl Appeals 0F7e#&s P/ensednte-stnmp this notation and return it to merit Me address 5hoton above, XPilso reouest thflt you notifi) rtfe of the Courtis ruling on my TAotion. RECEIVED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS JAN 12 2015 Abel Acosta, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Semien, William Paul, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/semien-william-paul-texapp-2015.