Semien v. Haas-Hirsch Estate

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Semien v. Haas-Hirsch Estate

281 So. 2d 758, 1973 La. LEXIS 6047

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedAugust 31, 1973

DocketNo. 53793

StatusPublished

This text of 281 So. 2d 758 (Semien v. Haas-Hirsch Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Semien v. Haas-Hirsch Estate, 281 So. 2d 758, 1973 La. LEXIS 6047 (La. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Joshua Semien applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in the judgment complained of.

TATE, DIXON and CALOGERO, JJ., dissent from denial. The lay evidence as to disabling pain, accepted by the trial court, adequately proves disability despite speculative medical opinion to the contrary. See Williams v. East, 261 La. 959, 261 So.2d 629 (1972).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Joshua Semien applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in the judgment complained of.

TATE, DIXON and CALOGERO, JJ., dissent from denial. The lay evidence as to disabling pain, accepted by the trial court, adequately proves disability despite speculative medical opinion to the contrary. See Williams v. East, 261 La. 959, 261 So.2d 629 (1972).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 So. 2d 758, 1973 La. LEXIS 6047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/semien-v-haas-hirsch-estate-la-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack