SEMERJIAN

11 I. & N. Dec. 751
CourtBoard of Immigration Appeals
DecidedJuly 1, 1966
Docket1627
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 11 I. & N. Dec. 751 (SEMERJIAN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Board of Immigration Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SEMERJIAN, 11 I. & N. Dec. 751 (bia 1966).

Opinion

Interim Decision #1627

MASTER OF SEMERZIAX A-10417492 In Visa Petition Proceedings

Decided by Regional Commissioner June 28, 1986 (1) An immigrant faion within tho purview of section 212(a) (14), rinnitsra- tion and Nationality Act, as amended by P.L. 89-236, must establish a bona fide intent to work in the United States, immediately or in the forseeable future, in his qualifying endeavor or b a related field. (2) Since a mechanical engineer is a member of the professions within the meaning of sections 203(a) (3) and 101(a) (32) of the Act, as amended, a qualified mechanical engineer, who has established a bona fide intent to work in the United States in his profession, is eligible for third preference classification under the quota.

Discussion: This case comes forward on appeal from the decision of the District Director, Los Angeles, who denied the application on April 26, 1966 as follows: Ton have based your claim to eligibility for third preference classification . upon your profession of mechanical engineer. The record in your case reflects that since you obtained your degree in engineering you were employed in that field for a period of two months, from June 1965 to August 1965 and that since January 1966 you have been employed as a distributor for the Kirby Vacuum Cleaner Company. The record further reflects that you have been unable to secure employment as an engineer and that you have no definite plans to secure employment in that field in the near future. You base. there- fore, failed tb establish that you intend to pursue the profession upon which you base your petition for third preference classification., Applicant is a 36-year-old single male, a native and citizen of Syria. He was admitted to the United States as a student at New York, New York on October 27, 1956, destined to Bozeman, Montana, where he enrolled as a foreign student at Montana State College. He was granted extensions of stay in that status to March 20, 1965. Except for the first year applicant has been supporting himself by various odd campus jobs, summer employment, several scholarships, and from 1960 to 1965 as a salesman and serviceman for the Kirby 751 Interim Decision #1627 Company of Southern Montana, distributors of Kirby vacuum clean- ers. He was awarded a degree of Bachelor of Science in general studies on June 4, 1962 and a Bachelor of Science Degree in me- chanical engineering on March 20, 1965, both degrees from the Mon= tuna State College, Bozeman, Montana. On April 96, 1965 he applied for practical training as a field engineer for the Kirby Company of Southern Montana. This application was denied May 24, 1965 in that the practical training to be given by the Kirby Company was not sufficiently related to the field of mechanical engineering to justify granting the application. At the time his application for practical training was denied; applicant was granted until June 24, 1965 to depart voluntarily from the United States. He then left Montana and went to Los Angeles, , California, where he obtained employment with the Security Metal Products Corp. on June 28, 1965 as a junior mechanical engineer under a, training program with a starting salary of $400 per month. In August, 1965 Security Metal Products Corp. released him from their training program because his previous training did not meet company requirements. In a statement before an officer of this Service on April 21, 1966, the applicant testified that following his release by Security Metal Products Corp. he made various applications to other companies for a position as a mechanical engineer but was turned down because "I was not a citizen or resident of the United States." He further testified that he then borrowed $5,000 and Get up a business as area distributor of Kirby Vacuum Cleaners for the West Los Angeles and Hollywood area. He concluded his statement by saying, "It is my hope that I can make enough money to pay off debts and some day return to school to advance my education in engineering." - On December 14, 1965 the applicant submitted his petition in his own behalf for classification for preference status under section 203 (a) (3) of the-Immigration and Nationality Act on the basis of his profession as a mechanical engineer. The petition was accompanied by Form ES 575A, "Statement of Qualifications of Alien," indicating that he is seeking work in "mechanical engineering" and evidence that he was awarded a Bachelor of Science Degree in general studies and mechanical engineering at Montana State College, Bozeman, Montana. .This form also shows that at that time applicant was self-employed as area distributor for Kirby Vacuum Cleaners doing sales and service work. The District Director denied the petition in that petitioner had 'failed to establish that he intended to pursue the profession upon

752 Interim Decision *1627

which the petition for third preference classification was based, that is, the profession of mechanical engineer. Section 203(a) (3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act pro- vides for the issuance of visas "to qualified. immigrants who are mem- ber: of the professions, or who because of their exceptional ability in the sciences or the arts will substantially benefit prospectively the national economy, cultural interests, or welfare of the United States. Seetion 101(a) (32) states: "The term 'profession' shall in- •lude hilt not be limited to architects,•engineers, lawyers, physicians, • surgeons, and teachers in elementary or secondary schools, colleges, academies, or seminaries." The beneficiary is a member of a profession within the purview of section 203(a) (3) by reason of his academic degree in mechanical engineering from an accredited institution of higher learning. Be- for• the petition may be approved, in addition to determining that the beneficiary is quhlified professionally, the certification required. by section 212(a) (14) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended, must- have been issued by the Secretary of Labor (or his designated representative). This section provides as a prerequisite for the admission of certain aliens seeking to enter the United States for the purpose of performing skilled or unskilled_ labor that there must have been issued in their behalf a certification by the Secretary of Labor that: (A) there are not sufficient workers in the United States who are able, will- ing, qualified, and available at the time or application for a visa and ad- mission to the Uilited StatCs and the place where the. alien is to perform' such skilled or unskilled labor; and (B) the employment of such aliens will 'not adversely affect the wages and working conditions of Workeis in the United States similarly employed.

The section specifically includes within its ambit immigrant aliens described in section 203(a) (3). • The Secretary of Labor, pursuant to section 212(a) (14), has de- ' termined that mechanical engineering is a category in which there . are not sufficient workers who are • able, willing, qualified, and avail- able for employment, and employment in such category will not adversely affect the wages and working conditions of workers in the United States similarly employed (29 CFR 60, Schedule .11, Gioup II). The phrase "for the purpose of performing," in section 212(a) (14), clearly indicates that an immigrant alien within the contemplation of section 212(a) (14) must •establish a bona fide intent to engage immediately or in the foreseeable future in his profession or a related. field. In addition, at page 12 of the Rouse of Representatives Report

753 Interlin Decision *1627 No. 145, 89th Congress, First Session, prepared by the Committee• on the Judiciary in connection with H.R. 2580 (which, as amended, was enacted as P.L.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Immediate Business Systems, Inc. v. Richard
645 F. Supp. 355 (N.D. Georgia, 1986)
SHAH
17 I. & N. Dec. 244 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1977)
KUO
15 I. & N. Dec. 650 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1976)
ESSEX CRYOGENICS INDUSTRIES
14 I. & N. Dec. 196 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1972)
MAPILI
13 I. & N. Dec. 668 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1971)
ORTEGA
13 I. & N. Dec. 606 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1970)
KIM
13 I. & N. Dec. 16 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 I. & N. Dec. 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/semerjian-bia-1966.