Selwyn Village Homeowners Association v. Cline & Company, Inc.

667 S.E.2d 720, 362 N.C. 362, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 638
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 11, 2008·No. No. 597P07.·Published

Opinion

The defendant's Petition for Discretionary Review is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of its decision in light of Dogwood Development and Mgmt Co., LLC v. White Oak Transp. Co., Inc., 362 N.C. 191, 657 S.E.2d 361 (2008).

By order of the Court in Conference, this the 11th day of June, 2008.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Selwyn Village Homeowners Association v. Cline & Company, Inc., 667 S.E.2d 720, 362 N.C. 362, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 638 (N.C. 2008).

667 S.E.2d 720 (Selwyn Village Homeowners Association v. Cline & Company, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co.
657 S.E.2d 361 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2008)