Selwyn Village Homeowners Association v. Cline & Company, Inc.

667 S.E.2d 720
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 11, 2008·No. 597P07·Published

Opinion

667 S.E.2d 720 (2008)

SELWYN VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff
v.
CLINE & COMPANY, INC., Defendant.

No. 597P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

J. Donald Cowan, Jr., Cary, Elizabeth Brooks Scherer, Raleigh, Ralph C. Clontz, III, Charlotte, for Cline & Co.

Fred W. Devore, III, Charlotte, for Selwyn Homeowners Asso.

Prior report: 186 N.C.App. 645, 651 S.E.2d 909.

ORDER

The defendant's Petition for Discretionary Review is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of its decision in light of Dogwood Development and Mgmt Co., LLC v. White Oak Transp. Co., Inc., 362 N.C. 191, 657 S.E.2d 361 (2008).

By order of the Court in Conference, this the 11th day of June, 2008.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Selwyn Village Homeowners Association v. Cline & Company, Inc., 667 S.E.2d 720 (N.C. 2008).

667 S.E.2d 720 (Selwyn Village Homeowners Association v. Cline & Company, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co.
657 S.E.2d 361 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2008)
Selwyn Village Homeowners Ass'n v. Cline & Co.
651 S.E.2d 909 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)