Selvin Vasquez-Gomez v. State of Florida
This text of Selvin Vasquez-Gomez v. State of Florida (Selvin Vasquez-Gomez v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 28, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-0430 Lower Tribunal No. F13-14217 ________________
Selvin Vasquez-Gomez, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Laura Anne Stuzin, Judge.
Selvin Vazquez-Gomez, in proper person.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, LINDSEY and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Selvin Vasquez-Gomez appeals the trial court’s order summarily denying his untimely, successive postconviction motion as procedurally
barred, contending that he was precluded from raising his claims in prior
motions as they relied upon a 2023 change in the law. However, Vasquez-
Gomez is not entitled to relief from his procedural default as the 2023
amendment to section 794.011(2)(a), Florida Statutes, does not apply
retroactively to crimes committed before October 1, 2023. See Ch. 2023-25,
§ 1, Laws of Fla. (eff. Oct. 1, 2023); Bartels v. State, No. 4D2024-0728, 2025
WL 1318637, at *2 (Fla. 4th DCA May 7, 2025). Prior to this inapplicable
legislative change, it is clear that Vasquez-Gomez’s claims did not warrant
relief. See State v. Hogan, 451 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 1984) (holding that sexual
battery on victim less than twelve years old is not capital offense for purposes
of determining whether twelve-person jury is required); Snowden v. Donner,
464 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (indictment not necessary in “capital
crime” where death penalty is not possible); Cooper v. State, 453 So. 2d 67
(Fla. 1st DCA 1984) (information appropriate charging document and six-
person jury proper in sexual battery case where death is not possible
penalty); In re Amendment to Fla. Rules of Criminal Procedure-Rule 3.112
Minimum Standards for Attorneys in Capital Cases, 759 So. 2d 610, 614
(Fla. 1999) (minimum standards for attorneys in capital cases in Florida Rule
of Criminal Procedure 3.112 only apply to capital cases in which State is
2 seeking imposition of death penalty, and do not need to be applied in cases
where State has formally renounced any intention to seek that penalty).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Selvin Vasquez-Gomez v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/selvin-vasquez-gomez-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.