Selvage v. Lynaugh

Supreme Court

Selvage v. Lynaugh

493 U.S. 888, 110 S. Ct. 231

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 10, 1989

DocketNo. 87-6700

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 493 U.S. 888 (Selvage v. Lynaugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Selvage v. Lynaugh, 493 U.S. 888, 110 S. Ct. 231 (1989).

Pincite

Opinion

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of peti[889]*889tioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition, but rephrased as follows: “At the time petitioner was tried, was there ‘cause’ for not raising a claim based upon arguments later accepted in Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U. S. 302 (1989), and if not, would the application of a procedural bar to the claim result in a ‘fundamental miscarriage of justice,’ Smith v. Murray, 477 U. S. 527, 537-538 (1986)?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of peti[889]*889tioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition, but rephrased as follows: “At the time petitioner was tried, was there ‘cause’ for not raising a claim based upon arguments later accepted in Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U. S. 302 (1989), and if not, would the application of a procedural bar to the claim result in a ‘fundamental miscarriage of justice,’ Smith v. Murray, 477 U. S. 527, 537-538 (1986)?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

493 U.S. 888, 110 S. Ct. 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/selvage-v-lynaugh-scotus-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack