Seltzer v. Brundage
17 A. 9, 2 Monag. 426, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1385
This text of 17 A. 9 (Seltzer v. Brundage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Seltzer v. Brundage, 17 A. 9, 2 Monag. 426, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1385 (Pa. 1889).
Opinion
There was no error in the admission of the release referred to in the first assigment, nor the testimony of John Benson and Jacob G. Adams, referred to in the second and third assignments. The remaining assignments are to the charge of the court. A careful examination of it fails to disclose any error. We find nothing in this case which requires a discussion.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 A. 9, 2 Monag. 426, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seltzer-v-brundage-pa-1889.