Seltzer & Co. v. Livingston
This text of 361 F.2d 218 (Seltzer & Co. v. Livingston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
361 F.2d 218
In the Matter of A. SELTZER & CO., Inc., Crane-Gallo Artist
Suppliers, Inc., M. M. Michaels, Inc., Plaza
Artist Materials, Inc., Irving Berlin,
Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
David LIVINGSTON, as President of District 65, RWDSU,
AFL-CIO, an unincorporated Association of more
than seven members, the 'Union,'
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 409, Docket 30400.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Submitted April 14, 1966.
Decided April 20, 1966.
Herbert A. Lien, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Eugene G. Eisner, New York City, for defendant-appellee.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm the dismissal of plaintiffs' complaint seeking to stay arbitration for the reasons stated in Judge McLean's Opinion below, 253 F.Supp. 509.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
361 F.2d 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seltzer-co-v-livingston-ca2-1966.