Selmon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Selmon v. State

618 So. 2d 367, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5661, 1993 WL 168329

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 21, 1993·No. No. 93-01246·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying Anthony Selmon’s motion for postconviction relief because of his failure to support the basis of his motion with sworn facts is affirmed without prejudice to Selmon’s right to seek such relief in full compliance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Daniels v. State, 450 So.2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order denying Anthony Selmon’s motion for postconviction relief because of his failure to support the basis of his motion with sworn facts is affirmed without prejudice to Selmon’s right to seek such relief in full compliance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Daniels v. State, 450 So.2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Selmon v. State, 618 So. 2d 367, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5661, 1993 WL 168329 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

618 So. 2d 367 (Selmon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related