Selmon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Selmon v. State

195 So. 2d 249, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5340

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 22, 1967

DocketNo. 7349

StatusPublished

This text of 195 So. 2d 249 (Selmon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Selmon v. State, 195 So. 2d 249, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5340 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed under the authority of Dancy v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 208; Clark v. State, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 773; Byers v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 57; Duncan v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 161 So.2d 718; Taylor v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 171 [250]*250So.2d 402, and Anderson v. State, Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 887.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

ALLEN, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed under the authority of Dancy v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 208; Clark v. State, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 773; Byers v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 57; Duncan v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 161 So.2d 718; Taylor v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 171 [250]*250So.2d 402, and Anderson v. State, Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 887.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

ALLEN, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 So. 2d 249, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/selmon-v-state-fladistctapp-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack