Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Selmon v. State

Selmon v. State

195 So. 2d 249, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5340
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 22, 1967·No. No. 7349·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed under the authority of Dancy v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 208; Clark v. State, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 773; Byers v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 57; Duncan v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 161 So.2d 718; Taylor v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 171 [250] So.2d 402, and Anderson v. State, Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 887.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

ALLEN, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Selmon v. State, 195 So. 2d 249, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5340 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

195 So. 2d 249 (Selmon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duncan v. State
161 So. 2d 718 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Taylor v. State
171 So. 2d 402 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Dancy v. State
175 So. 2d 208 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Byers v. State
163 So. 2d 57 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Anderson v. State
164 So. 2d 887 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Clark v. State
174 So. 2d 773 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)