Selmi v. Stern
75 Pa. Super. 325, 1921 Pa. Super. LEXIS 8
Opinion
The court below held the statement of claim to be insufficient to sustain the action, and under the authority of Stone v. Marshall Oil Company, 188 Pa. 602; Hand v. Suravitz, 118 Pa. 202; Shilanski v. Farrell, 57 Pa. Superior Ct. 137, and Sgarlat v. Diggory, 68 Pa. Superior Ct. 53, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Selmi v. Stern, 75 Pa. Super. 325, 1921 Pa. Super. LEXIS 8 (Pa. Ct. App. 1921).
75 Pa. Super. 325 (Selmi v. Stern) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weinman v. Wilkinsburg & E. L. P. Ry. Co.
12 A. 288 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1888)
Stone v. Marshall Oil Co.
41 A. 748 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1898)
Shilanski v. Farrell
57 Pa. Super. 137 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Sgarlat v. Diggory
68 Pa. Super. 53 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)