Sellingsloh v. Sellingsloh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sellingsloh v. Sellingsloh

272 A.D.2d 761

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 18, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 761 (Sellingsloh v. Sellingsloh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sellingsloh v. Sellingsloh, 272 A.D.2d 761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of the Appellate Term affirmed, with costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glen non, Dore, Callahan and Peck, JJ.; Martin, P. J., dissents in the following memorandum: The defendant failed to show any merit in his alleged defenses. His affidavit is too indefinite to create a triable issue. The determination should be reversed and the order and the judgment for plaintiff granted by the Municipal Court should be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of the Appellate Term affirmed, with costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glen non, Dore, Callahan and Peck, JJ.; Martin, P. J., dissents in the following memorandum: The defendant failed to show any merit in his alleged defenses. His affidavit is too indefinite to create a triable issue. The determination should be reversed and the order and the judgment for plaintiff granted by the Municipal Court should be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sellingsloh-v-sellingsloh-nyappdiv-1947.