Selletti v. Liotti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Selletti v. Liotti

45 A.D.3d 669, 844 N.Y.S.2d 878

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 45 A.D.3d 669 (Selletti v. Liotti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Selletti v. Liotti, 45 A.D.3d 669, 844 N.Y.S.2d 878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.), entered November 2, 2006, which denied his motion, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant’s motion violated the rule against successive motions for summary judgment (see Williams v City of White Plains, 6 AD3d 609 [2004]; Capuano v Platzner Intl. Group, 5 AD3d 620, 621 [2004]; Klein v Auerbach, 1 AD3d 317, 318 [2003]; Davidson Metals Corp. v Mario Dev. Co., 262 AD2d 599 [1999]; Laxrand Constr. Corp. v R.S.C.A. Realty Corp., 135 AD2d 685, 686 [1987]).

We find no basis to award sanctions at this time. Spolzino, J.P., Krausman, Carni and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.), entered November 2, 2006, which denied his motion, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant’s motion violated the rule against successive motions for summary judgment (see Williams v City of White Plains, 6 AD3d 609 [2004]; Capuano v Platzner Intl. Group, 5 AD3d 620, 621 [2004]; Klein v Auerbach, 1 AD3d 317, 318 [2003]; Davidson Metals Corp. v Mario Dev. Co., 262 AD2d 599 [1999]; Laxrand Constr. Corp. v R.S.C.A. Realty Corp., 135 AD2d 685, 686 [1987]).

We find no basis to award sanctions at this time. Spolzino, J.P., Krausman, Carni and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.D.3d 669, 844 N.Y.S.2d 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/selletti-v-liotti-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack