Sellers v. Zimmerman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Sellers v. Zimmerman

21 Md. 355, 1864 Md. LEXIS 117

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedMay 11, 1864

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 Md. 355 (Sellers v. Zimmerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sellers v. Zimmerman, 21 Md. 355, 1864 Md. LEXIS 117 (Md. 1864).

Pincite

Opinion

Bartol, J.,

delivered the opinion of this Court:

This was an appeal from a, judgment at law: this Court reversed the judgment of the Circuit Court, and sent hack the case on procedendo. We are now called on to decide whether upon the judgment of reversal in the Court of Appeals, the party in whose favor such judgment was rendered is entitled to recover the Costs in both Courts. In the decision pronounced in the case of Doub vs. Mason & Wife, 5 Md. Rep., 612, Appendix, it was, said: “In all appeals from judgments at law, the. reversal or affirmance thereof always carries the costs in both Courts.” The 41st sec. of Article 29, of the Code, according to our construction of its language, makes the same provision. We are therefore of opinion, that upon the judgment of reversal in this case, the appellant is entitled to recover his costs incurred both in the Circuit Court and in the Court of Appeals, and to have execution therefor.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bartol, J.,

delivered the opinion of this Court:

This was an appeal from a, judgment at law: this Court reversed the judgment of the Circuit Court, and sent hack the case on procedendo. We are now called on to decide whether upon the judgment of reversal in the Court of Appeals, the party in whose favor such judgment was rendered is entitled to recover the Costs in both Courts. In the decision pronounced in the case of Doub vs. Mason & Wife, 5 Md. Rep., 612, Appendix, it was, said: “In all appeals from judgments at law, the. reversal or affirmance thereof always carries the costs in both Courts.” The 41st sec. of Article 29, of the Code, according to our construction of its language, makes the same provision. We are therefore of opinion, that upon the judgment of reversal in this case, the appellant is entitled to recover his costs incurred both in the Circuit Court and in the Court of Appeals, and to have execution therefor.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Md. 355, 1864 Md. LEXIS 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sellers-v-zimmerman-md-1864.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack