Sellers v. State of Florida
This text of Sellers v. State of Florida (Sellers v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-2440 _____________________________
ROBERT E. SELLERS,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. James Scott Duncan, Judge.
January 28, 2026
PER CURIAM.
The order of the lower court dismissing as moot Appellant’s Motion for a Rehearing/Reinstate Motion to Hear and Rule is not among the class of orders appealable by a defendant pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(1). The appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
OSTERHAUS, C.J., and ROBERTS and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Robert E. Sellers, pro se, Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Julian Elmo Markham, III, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sellers v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sellers-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.