Sellers v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Sellers v. State

162 S.E. 156, 44 Ga. App. 571, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 386

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 12, 1932

Docket21994

StatusPublished

This text of 162 S.E. 156 (Sellers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sellers v. State, 162 S.E. 156, 44 Ga. App. 571, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 386 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of simple larceny (cattle-stealing), and his motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not eror.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness. J. A. Brahe, for plaintiif in error. B. T. Caslellow, solicitor-general, Bond Almand, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of simple larceny (cattle-stealing), and his motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not eror.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness. J. A. Brahe, for plaintiif in error. B. T. Caslellow, solicitor-general, Bond Almand, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 S.E. 156, 44 Ga. App. 571, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sellers-v-state-gactapp-1932.