Sellers v. State

851 So. 2d 276, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11723, 2003 WL 21766256
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sellers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 838 So. 2d 661
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 1, 2003·No. No. 5D03-1986·Published

Opinion

SHARP, W., J.

Sellers appeals the summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), seeking post-conviction relief. He was sentenced to 50.88 months in prison, which included a three-year minimum mandatory term for the offense of trafficking in 28 grams or more of cocaine.1 He argues that the minimum mandatory term is illegal because it was imposed pursuant to Chapter 99-188, which was found to be unconstitutional because it violates the single-subject rule.2

This court has held that the constitutional violation in Chapter 99-188 has been retroactively cured. See Jackson v. State, 847 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). However, as we did in that case, we certify a conflict with Green v. State, 839 So.2d 748 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, C.J., and THOMPSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sellers v. State, 851 So. 2d 276, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11723, 2003 WL 21766256 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

851 So. 2d 276 (Sellers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. State
818 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Jackson v. State
847 So. 2d 1038 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Green v. State
839 So. 2d 748 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Herndon v. State
842 So. 2d 1026 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)