Sellers v. People
This text of 6 Ill. 183 (Sellers v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The case before us appears to have been the result of a voluntary contract, on the part of the petitioner, and under all the circumstances, we are not disposed to disturb it. We can se no good reason for the interference of the Court in the manner proposed, and will,' therefore, leave thepetitioner to seek a remedy, if any he has, by the prosecution of a writ of error, which he may yet do, not being barred by the Statute of Limitations. The motion is denied.
Motion denied.
Treat, J. declined hearing the motion jin this cause, or taking any part whatsoever in the decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Ill. 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sellers-v-people-ill-1844.