Sellers v. Mutual Home & Savings Ass'n

58 N.E. 1096, 155 Ind. 704, 1900 Ind. LEXIS 193
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided December 12, 1900·No. No. 18,851·Published

Opinion

Baker, J.

— Appellants brought this suit to compel the release of a building and loan mortgage. A demurrer was sustained to the complaint, and that ruling is assigned as error. The premium was a fixed rate. It is claimed that the contract is usurious. If it is usurious, the complaint shows sufficient payments to discharge the implied obligation to repay the money received of the association with six per cent, simple interest. If the contract is not usurious, it has not been satisfied. On similar facts, the questions here involved were decided adversely to appellants in International, etc., Ass’n v. Wall, 153 Ind. 554; and on the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sellers v. Mutual Home & Savings Ass'n, 58 N.E. 1096, 155 Ind. 704, 1900 Ind. LEXIS 193 (Ind. 1900).

58 N.E. 1096 (Sellers v. Mutual Home & Savings Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

International Building & Loan Ass'n v. Wall
55 N.E. 431 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1899)