Sellers v. Miami-Dade County School Board

788 So. 2d 1086, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8057, 2001 WL 649166
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 13, 2001
DocketNo. 3D00-1914
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 788 So. 2d 1086 (Sellers v. Miami-Dade County School Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sellers v. Miami-Dade County School Board, 788 So. 2d 1086, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8057, 2001 WL 649166 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

RAMIREZ, J.

Kenneth Sellers and Sylvia Sellers appeal the dismissal of their lawsuit against Kenneth Sellers’ employer, appellee Miami Dade County School Board. We affirm because Kenneth Sellers failed to comply in a timely manner with the notice of claim requirement contained in section 768.28(6), Florida Statutes (1996).

Kenneth Sellers was injured on February 12, 1996, when the machine he was operating crushed his foot, resulting in the amputation of his toes. He filed a claim [1087]*1087for workers’ compensation and on May 12, 1999, gave the School Board notice of his injury and claim for damages. The Sell-erses then filed a multi-count complaint against the School Board and the manufacturer of the machine on February 10, 2000.

The School Board moved to dismiss the complaint alleging that the Sellerses’ notice of injury and claim for damages to the School Board was untimely. The trial court granted the School Board’s motion with prejudice holding that the Sellerses had failed to give notice to the School Board within three years from the date in which the cause of action accrued.

The Sellerses argue that the trial court improperly dismissed their complaint because the limitations period does not accrue on the date of injury, but on the date the wrongdoing is discovered. The Sell-erses allege that the discovery of wrongdoing occurred after Kenneth Sellers’ injury during the taking of certain depositions in the workers’ compensation proceeding.

Section 768.28(6), Florida Statutes (1996), requires that an action against a government entity not be instituted unless a claim is presented “within three years after such claim accrues.” See Levine v. Dade County School Board, 442 So.2d 210 (Fla.1983). “[A] cause of action accrues when the injury occurs and the damage is sustained.” Department of Transp. v. Soldovere, 519 So.2d 616, 617 (Fla.1988). In this case, the Sellerses notified the School Board three years and three months after Kenneth Sellers was injured.

Additionally, the Sellerses proceeded to delay the filing of their lawsuit until almost two years after the discovery of the wrongdoing, despite having obtained the information necessary to discover the wrongdoing on July 17, 1998, during the deposition of Antonio Real. The Sellerses cannot fault the School Board for their own leisurely handling of their claim. The record is also devoid of any evidence that the School Board concealed any wrongdoing subsequent to Kenneth Sellers’ injury so as to toll the limitations period. See Almengor v. Dade County, 359 So.2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

For these reasons, the trial court properly dismissed the Sellerses’ complaint.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chakra 5 v. City of Miami Beach
254 So. 3d 1056 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
788 So. 2d 1086, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8057, 2001 WL 649166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sellers-v-miami-dade-county-school-board-fladistctapp-2001.