Sellers v. Kaur

District Court, E.D. California·Decided October 31, 2023·No. 2:23-cv-00337·Unknown

Opinion

TMaOnOyRa EE L. AMWo oFrIeR,M S,B PN.C 2. 06683 300 South First Street, Suite 342 San Jose, California 95113 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 E-mail: service@moorelawfirm.com

Attorney for Plaintiff, Raymon Sellers

) RAYMON SELLERS, ) Case No. 2:23-cv-00337-DJC-DB ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF ) LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED vs. ) COMPLAINT; ORDER ) RAJVIR KAUR, individually and dba A1 ) MARKET, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) )

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Raymon Sellers (“Plaintiff”), seeks to amend his complaint to allege additional access barriers which relate to his disability which were identified during the pendency of this action; WHEREAS, the Ninth Circuit both urges and requires Plaintiff to identify in his complaint all barriers which relate to his disability (Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc., 631 F.3d 939, 944 (9th Cir. 2011); Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 654 F.3d 903, 909 (9th Cir. 2011)); WHEREAS, Plaintiff has not unduly delayed the amendment, does not bring it in bad faith, the amendment is not futile, and such amendment does not prejudice the defendants, nor does the amendment in any way change the nature of the action; and STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; WHEREAS, this amendment would not alter any dates or deadlines set by the Court; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant Rajvir Kaur, individually and dba A1 Market, the parties to this Action, through their respective attorneys of record, that Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” with redlines showing the changes from the original Complaint. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Plaintiff shall file his First Amended Complaint within five (5) calendar days of the Court’s Order permitting such filing, and that Defendant’s response thereto shall be due as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dated: October 19, 2023 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorney for Plaintiff, Raymon Sellers

Dated: October 25, 2023 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

/s/ Grace E. Mehta Shane Singh Grace E. Mehta Attorneys for Defendant, Rajvir Kaur, individually and dba A1 Market

STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff may file his First Amended Complaint, a redlined copy of which was filed with the Parties’ stipulation, within five (5) calendar days of the date this Order is filed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s response thereto shall be filed within the time required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dated: October 30, 2023 /s/ Daniel J. Calabretta THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sellers v. Kaur, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Sellers v. Kaur (Sellers v. Kaur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co.
654 F.3d 903 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Quinlan v. Koch Oil Co.
25 F.3d 936 (Tenth Circuit, 1994)