Sellers v. Hutto

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Sellers v. Hutto

94 S.E. 582, 21 Ga. App. 398, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 604

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 12, 1917

Docket9003

StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 582 (Sellers v. Hutto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sellers v. Hutto, 94 S.E. 582, 21 Ga. App. 398, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 604 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

Under the facts of the case the judge of the superior court did not err in sustaining the certiorari and in'remanding the case for a new trial (this being the first grant of a new trial), with directions that the amendment to the original petition of the plaintiff in certiorari be allowed,-and that the demurrer to such petition be overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Certiorari; from Appling superior court — Judge Highsmith. April 11, 1917.

Padgett & Watson, for plaintiffs in error. W. W. Bennett, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI