Sellers v. Fahey
This text of Sellers v. Fahey (Sellers v. Fahey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7484
WILLIAM D. SELLERS, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board; DAVID N. HARKER, Vice-Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:06-cv-00351-JRS)
Submitted: March 19, 2008 Decided: April 16, 2008
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William D. Sellers, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
William D. Sellers, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See
Sellers v. Fahey, No. 3:06-cv-00351-JRS (E.D. Va. Sept. 18, 2007).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sellers v. Fahey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sellers-v-fahey-ca4-2008.