Sellers, Kendrick v. Madison Police Department

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin
DecidedJanuary 11, 2023
Docket3:22-cv-00637
StatusUnknown

This text of Sellers, Kendrick v. Madison Police Department (Sellers, Kendrick v. Madison Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Wisconsin primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sellers, Kendrick v. Madison Police Department, (W.D. Wis. 2023).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

KENDRICK DANE SELLERS, and RICHARD REYNOLDS, ORDER Plaintiff, v. Case No. 22-cv-637-wmc

MADISON POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.

Defendants.

KENDRICK DANE SELLERS,

Plaintiff, ORDER v. Case No. 22-cv-656-wmc JILL KAROFSKY, et al.

Plaintiff Kendrick Dane Sellers has submitted a motion for an order directing prison officials to pay the remainder of the filing fees from plaintiff’s release account. Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, an inmate who files a lawsuit in federal court under the in forma pauperis statute must pay the $350 filing fee, first by making an initial partial payment and then by sending the remainder of the fee to the court in installments of 20% of the preceding month’s income, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). This court entered orders in these cases assessing plaintiff initial partial payments of the filing fees, which plaintiff has paid. Plaintiff has been making monthly installment payments since then. The language of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) requires prison officials to use a prisoner’s release account to satisfy an initial partial payment if no other funds are available. Carter v. Bennett, 399 F. Supp. 2d 936, 936-37 (W.D. Wis. 2005). However, with the exception of such initial partial payments, this court does not have the authority to tell state officials whether, and to what extent, a prisoner should be able to withdraw money from a release account. I will

deny this motion.

ORDER IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Kendrick Dane Sellers’s motion for an order directing prison officials to pay the remainder of the filing fee in these cases from plaintiff’s release account is DENIED.

Entered this 11th day of January, 2022.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ STEPHEN L. CROCKER Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carter v. Bennett
399 F. Supp. 2d 936 (W.D. Wisconsin, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sellers, Kendrick v. Madison Police Department, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sellers-kendrick-v-madison-police-department-wiwd-2023.