Sellars v. New York City Housing Authority

173 A.D.2d 691, 571 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8196
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 28, 1991·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Katz, J.), dated April 11, 1989, which denied his motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, we find that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying his motion for leave to file a late notice of claim (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e). The plaintiff offered no excuse for his failure to file a timely notice of claim, or for his 14-month delay in making the instant application (see, Perry v City of New York, 133 AD2d 692; Matter of Heather v County of Rensselaer, 88 AD2d 718; Rodriguez v City of New York, 86 AD2d 533). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sellars v. New York City Housing Authority, 173 A.D.2d 691, 571 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8196 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

173 A.D.2d 691 (Sellars v. New York City Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ragin v. City of New York
222 A.D.2d 678 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Weber v. County of Suffolk
208 A.D.2d 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)