Sell v. Sell

870 So. 2d 833, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12341, 2003 WL 21919905
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 13, 2003·No. No. 3D03-1083·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Wife, Marilyn R. Sell, appeals from an order awarding temporary support, determining entitlement to temporary attorneys’ fees, and determining the validity of a pre-nuptial agreement between herself and Louis F. Sell. We affirm that portion of the order awarding temporary alimony to the Wife, including the amount of temporary alimony currently to be paid and retroactively as well. We also affirm that portion of the order determining that the Wife is entitled to temporary attorneys’ fees.

We treat the Wife’s appeal from that portion of the order determining the validity of the parties’ pre-nuptial agreement, which is not subject to review under Rule 9.130, as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny the writ on the grounds that irreparable harm cannot be demonstrated [834]*834since validity of the agreement is subject to review at the end of this action.

FLETCHER and WELLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sell v. Sell, 870 So. 2d 833, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12341, 2003 WL 21919905 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

870 So. 2d 833 (Sell v. Sell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carole Ann Berg v. Roy Timothy Young
175 So. 3d 863 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)