Selkowitz v. Selkowitz

195 Misc. 979, 80 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2640
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedApril 27, 1948
StatusPublished

This text of 195 Misc. 979 (Selkowitz v. Selkowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Selkowitz v. Selkowitz, 195 Misc. 979, 80 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2640 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1948).

Opinion

Beldock, J.

In this separation action there was a dismissal of the complaint (71 N. Y. S. 2d 192) which determination was [980]*980reversed by the Appellate Division. On the review in the Appellate Division plaintiff was granted a separation and the case was remitted to Special Term for determination on the questions of alimony and incidental relief (272 App. Div. 1071). Judgment was thereupon entered as directed by the Appellate Division.

Plaintiff now moves to examine defendant before trial as to his financial means. Defendant objects generally to the examination on the ground that the trial of the action having already been had, and judgment having been entered, he cannot at this time be ‘ ‘ examined before trial ’ ’. In addition he makes specific objections to items 1, 2, 14 and 15.

The general objection is untenable. Although judgment was entered granting a separation, the rights of the parties with respect to alimony and maintenance were not determined. It was for this reason that the matter was referred to Special Term. Thus the “ trial ” of this issue still remains undetermined. Plaintiff having established her right to a separation (Selkowitz v. Selkowitz, 272 App. Div. 1071, supra) such an examination is proper (Van Valkenburgh v. Van Valkenburgh, 149 App. Div. 482; Scheffer v. Scheffer, 183 Misc. 344).

With respect to the specific items objected to the motion is denied as to number 15. The information sought therein may be obtained by an examination on the other items. Motion granted as to all other items. Defendant is to produce the books, records, etc., as indicated in the moving papers. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Valkenburgh v. Van Valkenburgh
149 A.D. 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)
Scheffer v. Scheffer
183 Misc. 344 (New York Supreme Court, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 Misc. 979, 80 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/selkowitz-v-selkowitz-nysupct-1948.