Selkirk v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Selkirk v. State

815 So. 2d 758, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6170, 2002 WL 887204

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 8, 2002

DocketNo. 4D00-779

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 815 So. 2d 758 (Selkirk v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Selkirk v. State, 815 So. 2d 758, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6170, 2002 WL 887204 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged by information with armed robbery, a first degree felony under section 812.13(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1995). At his change of plea hearing he pled guilty to a reduced charge of strong arm robbery, a second degree felony under section 812.13(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1995). The trial court accepted the plea and orally adjudicated appellant guilty of strong arm robbery. The trial court then entered a written judgment adjudicating appellant guilty of armed robbery, not strong arm robbery.

In this appeal of appellant’s motion under Rule 3.800(b)(2), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure, appellant requests that this case be remanded for correction of the judgment to show appellant was convicted of strong arm robbery. The state con[759]*759cedes that this scrivener’s error should be corrected. It is so ordered.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

WARNER, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged by information with armed robbery, a first degree felony under section 812.13(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1995). At his change of plea hearing he pled guilty to a reduced charge of strong arm robbery, a second degree felony under section 812.13(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1995). The trial court accepted the plea and orally adjudicated appellant guilty of strong arm robbery. The trial court then entered a written judgment adjudicating appellant guilty of armed robbery, not strong arm robbery.

In this appeal of appellant’s motion under Rule 3.800(b)(2), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure, appellant requests that this case be remanded for correction of the judgment to show appellant was convicted of strong arm robbery. The state con[759]*759cedes that this scrivener’s error should be corrected. It is so ordered.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

WARNER, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

815 So. 2d 758, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6170, 2002 WL 887204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/selkirk-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack