Selina Rodriguez v. Edward Rodriguez
This text of Selina Rodriguez v. Edward Rodriguez (Selina Rodriguez v. Edward Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 6, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00038-CV ——————————— SELINA RODRIGUEZ, Appellant V. EDWARD RODRIGUEZ, Appellee
On Appeal from the 169th District Court Bell County, Texas1 Trial Court Case No. 296279
MEMORANDUM OPINION
1 Pursuant to its docket equalization authority, the Supreme Court of Texas transferred this appeal to this Court. See Misc. Docket No. 23–9109 (Tex. Dec. 21, 2023); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (authorizing transfer of cases); TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3. Appellant, Selina Rodriguez, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s
December 12, 2023 final judgment. Appellant has neither paid the required fees nor
established indigence for purposes of costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP.
P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a);
Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals,
and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No.
15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). On February 27, 2024, appellant was notified that
this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellate costs were not paid, or indigence
was not established, by March 28, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellant
did not adequately respond.
Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the
preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). On February 16,
2024, appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellant did
not submit written evidence that she had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee
for the preparation of the clerk’s record by March 18, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.3(b), (c). Appellant did not adequately respond.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and
want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
2 PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Selina Rodriguez v. Edward Rodriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/selina-rodriguez-v-edward-rodriguez-texapp-2024.