Selina Rodriguez v. Edward Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Selina Rodriguez v. Edward Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 6, 2024·No. 01-24-00038-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued August 6, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

Appellant, Selina Rodriguez, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s December 12, 2023 final judgment. Appellant has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). On February 27, 2024, appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellate costs were not paid, or indigence was not established, by March 28, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellant did not adequately respond.

Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). On February 16, 2024, appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellant did not submit written evidence that she had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the preparation of the clerk’s record by March 18, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellant did not adequately respond.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion issued August 6, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

Appellant, Selina Rodriguez, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s December 12, 2023 final judgment. Appellant has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). On February 27, 2024, appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellate costs were not paid, or indigence was not established, by March 28, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellant did not adequately respond.

Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). On February 16, 2024, appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellant did not submit written evidence that she had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the preparation of the clerk’s record by March 18, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellant did not adequately respond.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.

Selina Rodriguez v. Edward Rodriguez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Pincite

Selina Rodriguez v. Edward Rodriguez (Selina Rodriguez v. Edward Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.