Seligson v. Wichner

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Seligson v. Wichner

137 A. 925, 5 N.J. Misc. 604, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 156

DecidedJune 7, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 137 A. 925 (Seligson v. Wichner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seligson v. Wichner, 137 A. 925, 5 N.J. Misc. 604, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 156 (N.J. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum.

The original application before us was to dismiss the rule to show cause for lack of prosecution. Upon the argument, leave was asked and granted upon terms to perfect the proceedings under the rule. These terms, it is urged, have not been complied with.

Whether the terms imposed have been complied with or not is immaterial because we have considered the matters raised under the rule to show cause and find no reason for setting aside the verdict.

The rule to show cause will therefore be discharged, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum.

The original application before us was to dismiss the rule to show cause for lack of prosecution. Upon the argument, leave was asked and granted upon terms to perfect the proceedings under the rule. These terms, it is urged, have not been complied with.

Whether the terms imposed have been complied with or not is immaterial because we have considered the matters raised under the rule to show cause and find no reason for setting aside the verdict.

The rule to show cause will therefore be discharged, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 A. 925, 5 N.J. Misc. 604, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seligson-v-wichner-nj-1927.