Seligson v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Seligson v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

33 A.D.2d 516, 304 N.Y.S.2d 215, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3202

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 25, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.2d 516 (Seligson v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seligson v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., 33 A.D.2d 516, 304 N.Y.S.2d 215, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3202 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered on March 18, 1969, unanimously affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to respondent Kamerman. The matter of disclosure proceedings has been committed to Mr. Justice Carney, and we assume that, in due course and on proper application to him, such examination of partners will be allowed as reasonably necessary to secure proper disclosure and that, furthermore, in due course and upon a proper showing, an examination of third-party witnesses (including former employees) may be had if material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of the action. Concur— Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, Nunez and Maeken, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on March 18, 1969, unanimously affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to respondent Kamerman. The matter of disclosure proceedings has been committed to Mr. Justice Carney, and we assume that, in due course and on proper application to him, such examination of partners will be allowed as reasonably necessary to secure proper disclosure and that, furthermore, in due course and upon a proper showing, an examination of third-party witnesses (including former employees) may be had if material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of the action. Concur— Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, Nunez and Maeken, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 516, 304 N.Y.S.2d 215, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seligson-v-fidelity-casualty-co-nyappdiv-1969.