Seligman v. Schmidt

City of New York Municipal Court

Seligman v. Schmidt

23 N.Y.S. 319, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 520

DecidedMay 9, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 23 N.Y.S. 319 (Seligman v. Schmidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seligman v. Schmidt, 23 N.Y.S. 319, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 520 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

EHRLICH, C. J.

The court below held the answer to he defective, struck out certain portions, and ordered judgment on the balance, with permission to the defendant to correct the errors and deficiencies by amendment. The plaintiff appeals from the part of the order granting this privilege to the defendant. The court below had authority to grant the defendant the liberty to amend. [320]*320It is the power frequently exercised. The discretion was not abused in this instance, and the part of the order appealed from should therefore be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EHRLICH, C. J.

The court below held the answer to he defective, struck out certain portions, and ordered judgment on the balance, with permission to the defendant to correct the errors and deficiencies by amendment. The plaintiff appeals from the part of the order granting this privilege to the defendant. The court below had authority to grant the defendant the liberty to amend. [320]*320It is the power frequently exercised. The discretion was not abused in this instance, and the part of the order appealed from should therefore be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 N.Y.S. 319, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seligman-v-schmidt-nynyccityct-1893.