Seligman v. Rosenzweig

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Seligman v. Rosenzweig

98 N.Y.S. 221

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 26, 1906·Published

Opinion

NEWBURGER, J.

A careful reading of the record fails to disclose upon what theory this action was brought or the judgment rendered. Plaintiff brought an action against this defendant for the recovery of certain insurance policies, which resulted in his favor for the return of the policies and costs of the action. . Subsequently this action is brought to recover the sum of $50 for' moneys paid out by the plaintiff to the lawyer who appeared for him in the action against this defendant, brought to recover the insurance policies.

A -mere statement of plaintiff’s claim should have resulted in the dismissal of the complaint.

Judgment reversed, and judgment of dismissal on the merits directed, with costs of appeal and of the court below.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NEWBURGER, J.

A careful reading of the record fails to disclose upon what theory this action was brought or the judgment rendered. Plaintiff brought an action against this defendant for the recovery of certain insurance policies, which resulted in his favor for the return of the policies and costs of the action. . Subsequently this action is brought to recover the sum of $50 for' moneys paid out by the plaintiff to the lawyer who appeared for him in the action against this defendant, brought to recover the insurance policies.

A -mere statement of plaintiff’s claim should have resulted in the dismissal of the complaint.

Judgment reversed, and judgment of dismissal on the merits directed, with costs of appeal and of the court below.

All concur.

Seligman v. Rosenzweig, 98 N.Y.S. 221 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

98 N.Y.S. 221 (Seligman v. Rosenzweig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.