Seligman v. Rosenzweig
This text of 98 N.Y.S. 221 (Seligman v. Rosenzweig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A careful reading of the record fails to disclose upon what theory this action was brought or the judgment rendered. Plaintiff brought an action against this defendant for the recovery of certain insurance policies, which resulted in his favor for the return of the policies and costs of the action. . Subsequently this action is brought to recover the sum of $50 for' moneys paid out by the plaintiff to the lawyer who appeared for him in the action against this defendant, brought to recover the insurance policies.
A -mere statement of plaintiff’s claim should have resulted in the dismissal of the complaint.
Judgment reversed, and judgment of dismissal on the merits directed, with costs of appeal and of the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 N.Y.S. 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seligman-v-rosenzweig-nyappterm-1906.