Seligman v. Brook-Krasny

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Seligman v. Brook-Krasny

275 A.D.2d 431, 715 N.Y.S.2d 316

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 23, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 431 (Seligman v. Brook-Krasny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seligman v. Brook-Krasny, 275 A.D.2d 431, 715 N.Y.S.2d 316 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law article 16, inter alia, to invalidate a petition designating Alec Brook-Krasny as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 12, 2000, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the New York State Assembly for the 46th Assembly District, and a separate proceeding pursuant to Election Law article 16, inter alia, to validate the designating petition, Alec Brook-Krasny appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a final order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), dated August 17, 2000, as, after a hearing, in effect, invalidated the designating petition as to him, and denied the proceeding to validate it as to him.

Ordered that the final order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Reichbach at the Supreme Court. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law article 16, inter alia, to invalidate a petition designating Alec Brook-Krasny as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 12, 2000, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the New York State Assembly for the 46th Assembly District, and a separate proceeding pursuant to Election Law article 16, inter alia, to validate the designating petition, Alec Brook-Krasny appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a final order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), dated August 17, 2000, as, after a hearing, in effect, invalidated the designating petition as to him, and denied the proceeding to validate it as to him.

Ordered that the final order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Reichbach at the Supreme Court. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 431, 715 N.Y.S.2d 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seligman-v-brook-krasny-nyappdiv-2000.