Selig v. State

636 So. 2d 604, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4992, 1994 WL 203071
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 25, 1994·No. No. 94-0279·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand with directions that appellant’s motion, under Rule 3.800(a) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, be granted. Appellant should be resen-tenced in accord with the legal principles set out in Davis v. State, 552 So.2d 338 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

ANSTEAD, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Selig v. State, 636 So. 2d 604, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4992, 1994 WL 203071 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

636 So. 2d 604 (Selig v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. State
552 So. 2d 338 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)