Self v. State

458 So. 2d 1222, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2413, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16578
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 1984·No. No. AY-105·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Self appeals from an order of restitution. He contends the trial court erred in requiring him to pay the victim of his crime $15 per week for loss of income. There is evidence in the record from which the trial court could conclude the victim lost wages in the amount awarded as a result of Self’s criminal conduct.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, C.J., and ZEHMER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Self v. State, 458 So. 2d 1222, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2413, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16578 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

458 So. 2d 1222 (Self v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neal v. State
688 So. 2d 392 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Vanlieu v. State
630 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Osteen v. State
616 So. 2d 1215 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)