Self v. Hutton

395 So. 2d 382, 1981 La. App. LEXIS 4472
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 26, 1981
DocketNo. 13942
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 395 So. 2d 382 (Self v. Hutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Self v. Hutton, 395 So. 2d 382, 1981 La. App. LEXIS 4472 (La. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

EDWARDS, Judge.

Plaintiff, Fannie T. Self, brought a pos-sessory action against Jessie Hutton and twenty-two other named defendants. Plaintiff sought to be recognized as the possessor of a certain 41.36 acre tract in St. Helena Parish and prayed for judgment ordering defendants to assert their claim of ownership in a petitory action within sixty days after judgment or to be thereafter precluded from so doing.

Defendants denied that plaintiff was in actual possession of the property, urged that they possessed as owners by virtue of inheritance, and claimed that Fannie Self, with their permission, was possessing for them.

Following trial, plaintiff was awarded judgment as prayed for. Defendants appeal, complaining of several findings of fact by the trial court, all of which resulted in the determination that Fannie Self was, indeed, in possession of the tract in question.

In a well-reasoned opinion, the district judge stated that he could find no evidence to substantiate defendants’ claim that plaintiff was possessing for them. Our review of the record likewise discloses no such evidence.

To the contrary, the record shows that Fannie T. Self is and has been possessing the property as owner for several years. Her living in the house, prior cultivation of the tract, gardening, and applications for homestead exemptions are the acts of an owner.

Defendants’ claim that, due to a disturbance of plaintiff’s possession in 1973, her 1975 possessory action had prescribed, LSA-C.C.P. Art. 3658, is without merit. It is well established that numerous disturbances may occur without interrupting possession. Liner v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Company, 319 So.2d 766 (1975). In the present case, plaintiff ignored the first disturbance but brought suit at the second. Such was her right.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. All costs, both trial and appellate, are to be paid by defendants.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heirs of Hutton v. Self
449 So. 2d 553 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1984)
Whitley v. Texaco, Inc.
434 So. 2d 96 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
395 So. 2d 382, 1981 La. App. LEXIS 4472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/self-v-hutton-lactapp-1981.